Shared Water Bore Agreement

Unless the issue is contractual, a neighbouring owner is limited in the use of his land only by the zoning and construction rules applicable to the property. Potential drilling owners can share a water bore in Perth. Drilling can be divided by up to 4 neighbors, but we only recommend that two neighbors share, as this is most likely to succeed in the long run. The Boreman may, upon request, submit a joint drilling agreement. This is an important part of the process because it protects both parties in the future. This issue has become very current in the Western Cape due to the persistent drought, as many people resort to dwindling wells or wells as an alternative source of water. Because of the cost of immersion these wells, they are often shared by neighbours with informal agreements on the periods and frequency of use. The risk of such an agreement arises when the owner of the property on which the drilling is located sells the property. There is no protection for neighbouring land to reach the well if the new owner is resistant. Neighbours will want to write simple and common agreements that draw the rights and managers of users. This step in the process is important because it protects all parties in the future. If you are considering sharing a drill, our team has written standard agreements that we can share with you.

It does not matter what the land is going through the drilling, since both owners are protected by the collective agreement. If you would like to learn more about sharing a water borehole, please contact Dragon Drilling online or on 01824 707777. It`s a shame that the developer hasn`t thought of providing a hole for the 7 properties or at least one place to place common properties, so we come up with a less than perfect solution. If we put everyone in our own lines, it solves the problem you mention at Longridge, even if you put two pipes in a ditch. I think if we share the cost of electricity according to what the water meter says, everyone uses it, it should be fair, especially since one has a small pool, the other two of us only want water for stock and gardens. With 20k, we wouldn`t do it ourselves, but the common costs do it well. Each commission of people is subject to personality issues, I am optimistic that, at the moment, all three of us agree to share all costs, including legal fees, with the exception of health issues in our own properties. If one of the other four owners wants to join later, it is on the basis that they share our initial construction costs and they make their own sanitary facilities… and approve all existing rules. I was hoping that someone might have an existing legal agreement that I could work on, but that is probably too much to hope for.

There are certainly advantages or sharing of a water borehole as well as some areas that you need to be aware of: the water drilling is installed on one site and the water is directed to the other field. The hole is activated when Retic controllers activate the reactivation function for one of the two properties. Power can only be supplied by a house, so we can usually adapt a meter to measure usage and both people share the cost of the electricity used. The simple answer… Yes, it is possible that a water borehole provides more than one property. I`m sure you`re sure. In fact, common drilling is very common in Perth! The best way to operate is for each neighbour to have its own independent network system.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by admin. Bookmark the permalink.